hotternhel wrote:
Let me explain something to you guys. I did not and will not give you every detail about the purchase and intended use of the horse. ...snip......... You took two little details and made it your entire argument, yet you are missing a lot of other facts.


Duh. What did you expect? If you don't want to give ALL the details, then don't only include the STUPID details. If you make a statement that sounds incredibly stupid/unlikely/unrealistic/ridiculous, don't be surprised to get called on it.

Congratulations on selling your horse, I hope she has a great new home.

IRONY: passing through wrote:What I find a little surprising is that anyone here thinks it is their right to publish and challenge anything about my personal finances. That is a little over the top and probably falls under the category of just because you can doesn't mean you should.

ckayser wrote:Shit Im suppose to skim this stuff................ DDR why didnt you tell me??
KG349 wrote:Disclaimer: This thread was not intended to irk anybody.
reachthestars wrote: Ugh......... can someone hand me a clue-by-4?
erika wrote: That's how they get you... by handing out free lungs.
Elfinbien wrote:I did read. It was incredible. Your insight into the situation was gripping and I couldn't pull myself away from your post. I am in awe of your awesome ability and am in fact beginning a religion to worship you and your greatness. We shall have doctrines of unneeded bitchiness and your worshipers shall wear funny hats. It will be glorious.
DrCox wrote: Ladies, people aren't chocolates. D'you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive bobble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine
CassielFell wrote: I now have to dub thee Scroto Baggins from Lord of the Cock Rings.