erika wrote:
Callisto04 wrote:
ravelyan wrote:
Lol, can anyone in this little spat actually articulate what you're fighting about?

Everybody is agreed that HnH's mare is a nice horse.
Everybody is agreed that it was a good sale.
Many people have been bemused by the idea that someone would ship a horse to Australia just to trail ride; those same people have also said that it's the buyer's money and he can do what he wants with it.

So why all the bitch slapping?
I'm sorry, but when I sell something and the reaction is that my buyer must have more money than brains, I would feel offended too. It makes the deal look like I took advantages of him/her.

See this makes me feel like we're really not reading the same thread.  Or that some people are only reading bits and pieces o the thread.


Tell me about that. I think 90% of the problems on this board are because of that. Some people are even so proud about it that they have or had it in their signature. Maybe what was said was, because of what has been said here in the past (probably by other people than those involved here), misunderstood. So now that this has been cleared up, let's get on.

HNH, congratulations on the sale. I'm happy to see that some people still want to pay good money for a good horse.


Trial-by-fieldwork distinguishes us from neighbouring tribes: the namby-pampy sociologists and social psychologists with whom we might be otherwise - God forbid - easily be confused - Kate Fox