ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 7839
Jun 29 10 9:08 AM
slvrblltday wrote:baxtersmom wrote:slvrblltday wrote:sunridge1 wrote:I'm having a real hard time buying this "evidence".For the third time...the study does not claim any of their results to be evidence of anything - they have not drawn conclusions. They have done a statistical study and have NOT drawn conclusions from it. The Paulick Report article does a write up of the study to bring it to our attention, that has nothing to do with the study. Why not READ all the available text, including the study itself before making judgments or assumptions? I'm not asking anyone to believe what I believe, actually I'd like people to think on it on their own and draw their own informed decisions. It's up to you to decide what these stats mean, and whether you believe and find credible Bramlage's opinion, research and work.Actually, at least in the part you posted, there are a number of definite conclusions being given. When I have time, I will look at the linked data and analysis, but the write up itself is already very poorly done from a research standpoint, and very, very suspect.I'm not sure which part I posted that you are talking about - I didn't quote any text from the study. The study is here and includes nothing but the stats. I'm sure my OP was confusing because the subject was the TOBA study but I also quoted and linked to a number of different resources. But when I said "They have done a statistical study and have NOT drawn conclusions from it" I was referring to the study in question, the TOBA study. There is no write up. Any written text is not associated with the TOBA study and I cited its source in the OP.
baxtersmom wrote:slvrblltday wrote:sunridge1 wrote:I'm having a real hard time buying this "evidence".For the third time...the study does not claim any of their results to be evidence of anything - they have not drawn conclusions. They have done a statistical study and have NOT drawn conclusions from it. The Paulick Report article does a write up of the study to bring it to our attention, that has nothing to do with the study. Why not READ all the available text, including the study itself before making judgments or assumptions? I'm not asking anyone to believe what I believe, actually I'd like people to think on it on their own and draw their own informed decisions. It's up to you to decide what these stats mean, and whether you believe and find credible Bramlage's opinion, research and work.Actually, at least in the part you posted, there are a number of definite conclusions being given. When I have time, I will look at the linked data and analysis, but the write up itself is already very poorly done from a research standpoint, and very, very suspect.
slvrblltday wrote:sunridge1 wrote:I'm having a real hard time buying this "evidence".For the third time...the study does not claim any of their results to be evidence of anything - they have not drawn conclusions. They have done a statistical study and have NOT drawn conclusions from it. The Paulick Report article does a write up of the study to bring it to our attention, that has nothing to do with the study. Why not READ all the available text, including the study itself before making judgments or assumptions? I'm not asking anyone to believe what I believe, actually I'd like people to think on it on their own and draw their own informed decisions. It's up to you to decide what these stats mean, and whether you believe and find credible Bramlage's opinion, research and work.
sunridge1 wrote:I'm having a real hard time buying this "evidence".
Share This