slvrblltday wrote:
I don't see any words you've quoted but mine or other posters'.

Look, I didn't put this up to say 'hear ye, hear ye, the answers have all been found' - if you look at the comments the study gets shredded with a whole lot more concrete points than are being given here, and valid ones, and ones with which I agree.

"The "study" you've linked to here is not really a study." - okay, every media outlet I've read refers to it as a study, so I chose to refer to it that way as well. That's all.

I quoted the whole section from the Thoroughbred Safety Committee on Soundness Issues, and highlighted the portions that were egregiously incorrect. I believe that was a transcript of the talk given by Bramlage about the "study" you are discussing?

Your references are not clear. What you've linked to as a "study" is just a pdf of data, out of context. My point is that you haven't actually linked to anything that someone with research training (ie me) can analyze.