Ah but I didn't claim for my generalization to be based in science (ETA: also, mine was more of an "if someone does this, I think this about him" vs. "all people who are this are that" so not quite a true generalization, more like a conditional opinion of others)

I like you, slvr (had to go up to see how to spell that haha). I like that you posted some intriguing information. But I think you may just be too vested in the supposed conclusions of this "research" and now you're getting upset over people finding what they suspect to be holes in the information presented.

All the last few posters have done is critique the piece as "research." This is exactly what we would have done if someone posted a stallion on here (or anything else for that matter) It's good not to take things at face value.

Last Edited By: StreetMutt Jun 29 10 11:58 AM. Edited 1 times.