It wasn't really your reply to mine that got my back up, it was yours to Ch slamming her for providing a single case study/generalization when in fact you had demonstrated the same reasoning previously.

I acknowledge that you did state that the study lacked consideration of other variables, I didn't have a problem with that part of your post. I wasn't really even going to say anything about your generalization about "rich horse owners" because I figured it wasn't worth the discussion/argument. I didn't jump on you for it, but felt I had to say when you jumped on CH for the same thing.

I think part of the problem with the way this thread turned out is no one was really sure of your position or what you were trying to say/show and the material was presented in a bit of a confusing way.

Slamming all of us in your posts by stating that the comments section of that article had brighter replies than here wasn't exactly conductive to encouraging conversation either.

imageimageimage

"Planning to not succeed is stupid. If it doesn't work out, I'll make a new plan then. But I'm not starting out with a plan to not succeed."