ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 3179
Apr 18 11 8:26 PM
HorseHawk wrote: Maybe you can post a short backed barrel horse like you photo-shopped that palomino, that has won more or sired more winners than him ...?
Posts: 14759
Apr 18 11 8:31 PM
unkcommentator wrote:HorseHawk wrote: Maybe you can post a short backed barrel horse like you photo-shopped that palomino, that has won more or sired more winners than him ...?HH, I really don't care. Even if I found and posted a hundred pics of horses who have won and done more it still is NOT going to make me like the palomino. You may love him, I don't. At least not that pic of him. Maybe you find a better one to change my mind?
*******************************
Nightgames owes me $100. If this message is still in my siggy, she hasn't paid up yet.
Apr 18 11 8:35 PM
HorseHawk wrote: I thought from your comment you didn't like him because you thought he had a long back. Now it sounds like you just don't like Palominos...? LOL!
goflipper said:Just come back in a few years and show what you've produced and what it's done. Until then no one knows shit, and it's just Backyard Breeders Gone Wild. The proof is in the results.
Apr 18 11 8:39 PM
Posts: 203
Apr 18 11 8:41 PM
TROLL
Apr 18 11 8:44 PM
unkcommentator wrote:HorseHawk wrote: I thought from your comment you didn't like him because you thought he had a long back. Now it sounds like you just don't like Palominos...? LOL!LOL!! I have a few palominos, so no, that is not the issue. That pic you post of him makes him look off, to me. It may be fine to you. To me it is blurry, and no I don't need glasses to look at the screen. Everything else is clear but that pic. Can't you find a better pic of him? That one really sucks.
Apr 18 11 9:05 PM
HorseHawk wrote: Oh! Here's another pic BTW...
Apr 18 11 9:07 PM
HorseHawk wrote: And here's one of his many famous sons...but you probably don't like him either...
Apr 18 11 9:08 PM
Apr 18 11 9:09 PM
HorseHawk wrote: How's this...?
Apr 18 11 9:22 PM
unkcommentator wrote:HorseHawk wrote: And here's one of his many famous sons...but you probably don't like him either... His front is lower than his rear end and he looks weak in the pasterns to me. Also goose rumped, but his looks more proportional than his sire does. Break him into thirds.JMO.
Apr 18 11 9:26 PM
unkcommentator wrote:HorseHawk wrote: How's this...? What did you do? Scrunch it up in Photoshop? Clearer but the rear still does not look like it goes to that animal to me. JMO.
Posts: 7151
Apr 18 11 9:42 PM
Posts: 29092
Apr 18 11 11:17 PM
wolfbitch wrote: (Jesus Christ, I know I'm going to hell for this, but:)I agree with HH about the pali. In my opinion, he's a hell of a good looking horse. Yes, he appears to have a long back, but not a super-long back. And the muscling in his rear and shoulders appears to give more than good support to his back. He couldn't have developed that kind of muscle if he had a weak skeletal structure, either. (Yep, I think I just heard God Himself faint.)
Apr 19 11 12:03 AM
Apr 19 11 12:12 AM
HorseHawk wrote: Oh, the goose rump horse is on the right...
Posts: 4793
Apr 19 11 12:43 AM
goflippr wrote: Tal is like the Wizard of Oz.
Tal is like the Wizard of Oz.
Posts: 530
Apr 19 11 3:34 AM
Posts: 9400
Apr 19 11 4:58 AM
Dear High Road, As much as I enjoy the lack of traffic on you, there are days where the shortcut onto Bitchslap Road, You Want a Piece of THIS Circle and You Have the Maturity of a 10 Year Old Avenue ...seem.....well- rally really tempting.
Posts: 2227
Apr 19 11 5:07 AM
mtrose wrote: stxreiner wrote: and what is BC's show record to prove that other qualified APHA judges agree that he has " individual quality and type" of a current APHA champion and is an asset to the future of the APHA breed? And just an observation: if his stud fee is still $750, then based on a somewhat commonly used rule of thumb that weanling/yearlings base value is 3X stud fee, his babies should be worth around $2250.I'm just going to say that this is a little ironic to me, considering that it appears from your website that neither your stallion nor most of your mares have a show record.
stxreiner wrote: and what is BC's show record to prove that other qualified APHA judges agree that he has " individual quality and type" of a current APHA champion and is an asset to the future of the APHA breed? And just an observation: if his stud fee is still $750, then based on a somewhat commonly used rule of thumb that weanling/yearlings base value is 3X stud fee, his babies should be worth around $2250.
Share This